DaVita Pascua Yaqui Tribe Dialysis
✓ In-center
98/ 100
DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii)
Dialysis center · 7355 S Houghton Rd Ste 101, Tucson, AZ 85747
CMS star rating
78/ 100
Above average
Better than 78% of US centers
At a glance
- Operator
- DaVita · For-profit
- Dialysis options
- ✓ In-center hemodialysis✗ Peritoneal dialysis (PD)✗ Home hemodialysis training
- Evening shift
- No shift starting after 5 pm reported
- Stations
- 12 dialysis chairs
- Medicare-certified
- Since 2010-02-23 · CCN 032632
- Rank in Tucson, AZ
- #4 of 16 dialysis centers
- Rank in Arizona
- #19 of 121 scored centers
- County
- Pima
- ESRD Network
- Network 15 (for grievances and help changing centers)
Patient outcomes and quality of care
CMS quality measures: better than the national average on 6 of 10 reported measures, worse on 3.
| Measure | This center | State | National | vs. national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient deaths (risk-adjusted rate) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 19.8 | 22.4 | 22.2 | Better |
| Hospital admissions (risk-adjusted rate) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 112.6 | 142 | 148 | Better |
| Readmitted within 30 days of a hospital stay (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 32% | 27.5% | 27.2% | Worse |
| Blood transfusions (risk-adjusted rate) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 16.9 | 26.9 | 32.5 | Better |
| Bloodstream infections (ratio to expected) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 0 | 0.25 | 1 | Better |
| Emergency room visits (ratio to expected) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.99 | About the same |
| ER visits within 30 days of a hospital stay (ratio to expected) (lower is better) CMS: As Expected | 1.31 | 1.04 | 1.04 | Worse |
| Patients dialyzing through an AV fistula CMS: As Expected | 71.5% | 64.1% | 57.1% | Better |
| Patients with a long-term catheter (90+ days) (lower is better) | 11% | 16.1% | 19% | Better |
| Patients on the kidney transplant waitlist CMS: As Expected | 9.6% | 10.5% | 16.5% | Worse |
Rates for deaths, hospital admissions and transfusions are risk-adjusted per 100 patient-years; ratios compare the center to what CMS expects for its patients (1.00 = as expected). State figures are the average of centers in the state. 'CMS:' notes show CMS's own verdict after accounting for statistical uncertainty.
What patients say (ICH-CAHPS survey)
CMS has not published these measures for this center (usually because too few patients were treated in the reporting period, or the center is new).
Location
Other dialysis centers in Tucson
DaVita Northwest Tucson Dialysis
✓ In-center
96/ 100
DaVita Tucson Central Dialysis
✓ In-center✓ PD
91/ 100
032613 Northwest Tucson Dialysis (Fmc)
✓ In-center✓ PD✓ Home HD
77/ 100
032626 Midvale Park Dialysis (Fmc)
✓ In-center✓ PD
74/ 100
Frequently asked questions
Is DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) Medicare-certified?
Yes. DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) (CMS Certification Number 032632) has been Medicare-certified since 2010-02-23, which means it meets federal ESRD Conditions for Coverage and Medicare pays for covered dialysis there.
What dialysis options does DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) offer?
DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) reports offering in-center hemodialysis with 12 dialysis stations. It does not report a shift starting after 5 pm.
How does DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) compare to other dialysis centers?
DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) scores 78/100 on Dialysis Scorecard (above average), better than 78% of US dialysis centers, and ranks #19 of 121 scored centers in Arizona. CMS gives it 4 out of 5 stars.
Who owns DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii)?
DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) is operated by DaVita and is a for-profit facility.
Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, Dialysis Facility Compare and ICH-CAHPS (2026-09-29). Dialysis Scorecard is not affiliated with DaVita Rita Ranch Dialysis (Aka Tucson East Ii) or DaVita. Data may lag real-world changes; verify with the center. Is this your center? Report a correction.